This paper summarizes the results of research conducted by PRQA that showed that developers attending a trade show performed significantly worse than static analysis tools, demonstrating the need for automated tools such as QA·C and QA·C++.
Provides the sample source code used during the exercise
Shows the limitations of the compiler in identifying errors and issues
Demonstrates the variability and limitations of manual code reviews
Illustrates the effectiveness of automated static analysis code inspection compared to manual reviews